Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Francisco Cerundolo vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cerundolo vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Francisco Cerundolo vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cerundolo 0 - 0 Zandschulp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cerundolo has won 51.73% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp has won 46.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cerundolo, in recent form, has won 50.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 49.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.46% and 31.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cerundolo has saved 58.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 58.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cerundolo has won 54.24% of matches played (W/L 32/ 27), with Zandschulp winning 46.43% (W/L 26/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cerundolo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 246/ 108), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Cerundolo has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 13), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 9/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cerundolo has played against opponents with an average rank of 161.47 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 172.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cerundolo has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cerundolo has converted 44.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 38.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
27
Rank
19
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
99
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
66% (293-152)
Career Total W/L
63% (332-199)
50% (16-16)
YTD W/L
40% (12-18)
$3,129,565
Career Prize Money
$2,900,825
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Francisco Cerundolo vs Botic Van De Zandschulp For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Cerundolo VS Zandschulp
Sportsbook
Offer
Cerundolo VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Francisco Cerundolo | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (16/16) | 40% (12/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (45/41) | 41% (28/41) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (421/397) | 47% (314/360) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (13/11) | 47% (7/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.4 |
| Aces Total | 97 | 130 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 82 | 98 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:27 | 1:47:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 206.31 | 181.13 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1773/2639) | 62% (1326/2130) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (1157/1773) | 68% (906/1326) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (448/866) | 46% (372/804) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (114/259) | 39% (74/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1048/2602) | 38% (817/2138) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 58% (7/5) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (4/8) | 38% (5/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (12/26) | 44% (12/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (5/13) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (18/4) | 6% (18/1) |
Francisco Cerundolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats 
Novak Djokovic
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
67%
(
123 of
183)
1st Serve %
65%
(
95 of
146)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
85 of
123)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
58 of
95)
50%
(
30 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
37%
(
68 of
183)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
56 of
146)
171
Total Points Won
158
|
6-1 5-7 3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tommy Paul
73%
(
77 of
106)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
115)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
44 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
57 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
102
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Filip Misolic
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Matteo Gigante
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Alexander Zverev
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tommy Paul
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
97
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Cerundolo Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Cerundolo are available here and Zandschulp photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Francisco Cerundolo
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
